Lusha has long been a popular choice for LinkedIn prospecting, trusted by more than 1.5 million users to quickly find emails and phone numbers. Its simplicity and low cost make it appealing for teams just getting started.
Many teams find that Lusha’s limited database and data accuracy issues hold them back, especially when scaling outbound campaigns that require higher volumes of reliable contact data. hh
TL;DR:
Credit Limitations - Even with paid plans, credits deplete quickly. The Pro plan's 250 credits often run out within a week for active SDRs, and unused credits expire monthly.
Data Quality Concerns - With an accuracy rate of 60-70%, Lusha often results in bounced emails and disconnected numbers, affecting outreach effectiveness and domain reputation.
Limited Features - Lusha focuses solely on contact discovery, lacking essential features like intent data, engagement tools, and automation to support the full lead generation lifecycle.
International Coverage Issues - European data enrichment is limited, with incomplete GDPR compliance and a lack of mobile numbers outside the U.S.
Lusha works well for quick LinkedIn prospecting, but growing teams often need more than just basic company data lookups.
That’s why in this guide, we’ve rounded up the 12 best Lusha alternatives for 2025.
Quick Rundown of Best Alternatives to Lusha (2025)
Tool | Best For | Starting Price | Match Rate/Accuracy | Key Advantage |
FullEnrich | Maximum contact coverage via waterfall enrichment | $29/month | 85%+ (triple-verified) | Queries 20+ providers until finding verified data |
Apollo.io | All-in-one sales platform for SMBs | $59/user/month | 70-85% | Combines data with sequencing, dialer, CRM |
Cognism | GDPR-compliant European prospecting | ~$15,000/year | 98% (EU mobiles) | Human-verified Diamond Data® for Europe |
Seamless.AI | High-volume prospecting with AI search | Custom (~$79+/user) | 60-75% | Unlimited users on Enterprise plans |
RocketReach | Technical recruiting and global coverage | $69/month | 70-80% | 700M+ profiles with API access |
Sales Navigator | Relationship-based enterprise selling | $99/month | N/A (no direct contacts) | Real-time updates and warm intros |
Lead411 | Unlimited US prospecting | $99/user/month | 96% (emails) | No credit limits, triple verification |
Kaspr | European LinkedIn extension | $65/user/month | 85-90% (EU) | Cognism-powered GDPR data |
UpLead | Quality-guaranteed contacts | $99/month | 95% guaranteed | Automatic refunds for bounces |
Snov.io | Email-first outreach automation | $39/month | 85% (emails) | Built-in drip campaigns included |
Clearbit/Breeze | HubSpot inbound enrichment | $12K-30K/year | ~85% | Real-time form enrichment |
Dealfront | European website intelligence | €99+/month | 80-85% (EU) | Combines visitor tracking with prospecting |
LeadIQ | Salesforce workflow optimization | $20/user/month | 75-80% | Auto-deduplication and CRM sync |
PeopleDataLabs | Developer API for custom solutions | $98/month | Variable | 1.5B+ profiles via API |
Hunter.io | Email-only discovery | $49/month | 90%+ (emails) | Domain-based email finding |
Why Teams Look for alternatives to lusha
Here are some of the main pain points:
Rapid Credit Depletion
Even with paid plans, credits run out fast, especially when running outreach campaigns at scale. For example, Lusha's Pro plan includes 250 credits, which typically last only a week for active SDRs.
Data Quality Issues
Lusha's 60-70% accuracy rate results in teams frequently facing high bounce rates, incorrect numbers, and wasted hours chasing dead leads. Sales leaders report significant frustration with poor data accuracy that harms productivity and results.
Limited Beyond LinkedIn
Lusha excels for LinkedIn-based prospecting but falls short when it comes to more advanced account-based strategies.
It doesn’t offer buyer intent data, technographics, or deep company insights, making it less suitable for teams looking to go beyond simple lead generation.
Lusha works fine for quick prospecting, but growing teams need more than basic B2B data. To scale, they need accurate data, broader coverage, and tools that support every step of prospecting.
How We Evaluated Lusha Alternatives
Data Accuracy & Coverage
Reliable contact data is non-negotiable. We looked at each tool’s match rates, verification methods, and how often their databases are updated. Fresh, accurate b2b contact and quality data is what separates successful outreach from wasted time.Pricing Transparency
Unexpected costs can quickly derail budgets. We prioritized tools with clear, flexible pricing so teams can scale without getting locked into expensive contracts. Whether you’re a small team or an enterprise, knowing exactly what you’re paying for matters.Ease of Use
Prospecting shouldn’t be complicated. We assessed setup time, user interface quality, and learning curves to see how quickly SDRs can start generating leads. The faster they can get going, the better.Credit System Flexibility
Lusha’s strict monthly credit expiration can be frustrating. We checked if alternatives offer rollover credits or no-expiry options, ensuring teams aren’t penalized during slower months. Flexible credits mean less wasted resources.Integration Capabilities
Sales teams juggle multiple tools, so smooth integrations matter. We tested whether each platform connects easily with Salesforce, HubSpot, Outreach, and other popular platforms. Strong integrations save time and keep workflows seamless.Unique Features
Some sales intelligence platforms go beyond basic data. We noted tools offering buyer intent insights, enrichment workflows, in depth account data and other advanced features that make prospecting smarter and more targeted.Real User Feedback
Marketing claims only tell half the story. We dug into G2, Capterra, and Reddit reviews to see what actual users love (or don’t) about each platform. Real-world feedback helps separate hype from genuine value.
Top Lusha Alternatives in 2025
1. FullEnrich: Waterfall Enrichment for Maximum Coverage
Unlike Lusha's single-source model, FullEnrich offers a waterfall enrichment system that queries over 20 premium data providers. Instead of relying on a single database, FullEnrich checks multiple sources to ensure maximum data coverage.
If Clearbit misses a contact's email, it moves to Hunter & so on. This systematic approach results in 85%+ match rates - nearly double what Lusha delivers.
The real difference is in practice. Where Lusha might provide just 5 contacts from a 10-person target list, FullEnrich typically finds 8-9 contacts, all of which are triple-verified. For SDR teams, this means more conversations and a stronger sales pipeline.

Who FullEnrich is best for
Sales teams that need maximum contact coverage without enterprise price tag
Key Features:
Waterfall enrichment across 20+ data providers
Triple email verification, including catch-all detection
Provides both work and personal emails as well as mobile phones
Bulk CSV enrichment and real-time API
Credit rollover for up to 3 months
Unlimited users across all plans
FullEnrich Pricing:
Free plan: 50 credits
Start – $29/month: 500 credits
Pro – $55/month: 1,000 credits
Scale – From $500/month: Custom volume with SSO
One-time – $299: 5,000 credits valid for 6 months
Unlike Lusha’s monthly credit expiration, FullEnrich allows credits to roll over for 3 months, so you’re not penalized during slower periods.
This makes it an excellent option for teams that want flexibility in their credit usage.
Pros and Cons of FullEnrich
Pros | Cons |
Highest match rates in the industry (85%+) | No built-in sequencing tools |
Triple-verified data reduces bounces to below 1% | Primarily focused on enrichment, not a full sales suite |
Transparent pricing with credit rollover | Lacks intent data features |
No per-seat charges – every user gets access |
What real user say
With a solid 4.8/5 rating on G2, users consistently praise FullEnrich for its coverage improvement and credit flexibility.
Domenic G., CEO of a small business, shared:
“FullEnrich has been a game-changer for my prospecting workflow. The waterfall approach across 15+ vendors gives higher match rates, and the triple-layer verification system keeps bounce rates low. Integration with our CRM and outreach stack is seamless, and the interface is clean — I was up and running in minutes.” (Source)
Chris S., Managing Director at another small business, added:
“Does exactly what they say they do with ease. It’s quick, allows bulk or individual searches, and almost always finds an email, number, or both. I love that it complements my existing CRM rather than trying to replace it.” (Source)
Bottom Line
FullEnrich is a top Lusha alternative for teams prioritizing coverage and accuracy. It delivers verified emails and phone numbers through a multi-vendor waterfall approach for higher match rates. No outreach tools here, but the clean interface, fast setup, and reliable data make prospecting and enrichment effortless.
2. Apollo.io: All-in-One Sales Platform
Apollo.io is an all-in-one sales platform with a 275M+ contact database and built-in tools for sequencing, dialing, and email automation.
Unlike Lusha, it handles prospecting, outreach, and engagement in one place, saving hours of manual work.
The free plan offers more value than Lusha’s starter tier, and transparent pricing makes scaling easy. Data accuracy ranges from 60–85%, but the integrated workflow is a major time-saver for tea

Key Features:
275M+ B2B contacts with verified emails
Built-in sequencing and email automation
Integrated dialer with call recording
Chrome extension for LinkedIn and Gmail
AI writing assistant and lead scoring
Intent data on higher-tier plans
Apollo.io Pricing:
Free – $0: 100 credits/month, basic features
Basic – $59/user/month: 2,500 credits, CRM sync
Professional – $99/user/month: 4,000 credits, advanced features
Organization – $149/user/month: 6,000 credits, international dialer
With credits increasing as you move up the plans, Apollo.io offers more credits at a similar price point compared to Lusha, making it a more cost-effective choice for teams looking to scale.
Pros and Cons of Apollo.io
Pros | Cons |
Combines prospecting with engagement tools (sequencing, dialer, email automation) | Phone accuracy can be inconsistent (60–80%) |
Transparent and affordable pricing | International coverage is limited |
Strong free plan for testing the platform | Can feel buggy with rapid feature releases |
Active development with regular updates | Credits don’t roll over |
Integration with CRM systems for better workflow |
What Makes Apollo.io Better Than Lusha?
While Lusha focuses solely on contact discovery, Apollo.io offers a complete sales workflow: from finding and enriching contacts to sequencing, calling, and tracking engagement.
At similar price points, Apollo gives you 10x more credits (2,500 vs. 250) and built-in automation tools that would normally cost extra elsewhere.
This makes Apollo.io a cost-effective solution for teams that need an integrated platform for all stages of the sales process, without having to manage multiple subscriptions or tools.
What users are saying about Apollo
G2 rating: 4.5/5 (9,042 reviews): Some users praise Apollo.io for its automation and updated contact data.
Natasha, a reviewer from the UA, shared: “Great platform, regularly updates with new emails and numbers, and has helped automate our sales process.” (Source)
But not all Apollo.io users are impressed.
For instance Riley summed up their experience bluntly: “Awful customer service, poor data enrichment, use any other company other than them.” (Source)
Bottom Line
Apollo.io is a solid Lusha alternative for small to mid-sized teams that want everything in one place.
Its data might not be the absolute most accurate out there, but the full workflow (prospecting, engagement, and outreach) combined with fair pricing, makes it a practical choice for teams that want an all-in-one sales platform without juggling multiple tools.
3. Cognism: Premium European B2B Data
Cognism has built its reputation on Diamond Data®, a database of human-verified European mobile numbers that hits an impressive 98% accuracy.
Unlike Lusha, which struggles with GDPR compliance and EU coverage, Cognism makes it easy to stay compliant with the rules.
Every contact includes opt-out trails and permission status, so you are fully GDPR-compliant without extra legwork.
Teams targeting the UK, DACH, or Nordic regions consistently find 2 to 3 times more verified mobile numbers than with Lusha or most competitors.

Key Features:
Diamond Data® verified EU mobiles (98% accuracy)
Full GDPR compliance with audit trails
Bombora intent data integration
Do Not Call suppression (covering 13 countries)
400M+ global contacts in the database
Chrome extension for LinkedIn prospecting
Cognism Pricing:
Entry plans from ~$15,000/year
Diamond Data® typically around $25,000+/year
Custom packages based on markets and seats
Annual contracts only
Pros and Cons of Cognism
Pros | Cons |
Best-in-class EU mobile accuracy (98% verification) | Premium pricing comparable to ZoomInfo |
Strong GDPR compliance features | Limited US coverage compared to competitors |
Integration with Bombora intent data | Annual contracts required, no monthly options |
Unlimited exports on some plans | Learning curve for new users |
Do Not Call suppression for 13 countries |
What Makes Cognism Better Than Lusha?
Lusha’s European coverage is limited, and GDPR compliance can be shaky. Cognism focuses on GDPR-safe markets with human-verified mobile numbers at 98% accuracy.
Every contact comes with compliance proof, making EU prospecting safer and more reliable. It’s pricier, but for accuracy and compliance, Cognism delivers where Lusha falls short.
What users are saying about Cognism
G2 rating: 4.6/5 (1,092 reviews): Users praise Cognism for its accuracy, ease of use, and AI-powered efficiency.
Andrei Lehadus, a business development professional in the UK, shared:
“I have been using Cognism as part of my business development strategy. The platform makes it easier to identify and reach the right decision-makers, based on Job titles, size of the company and more.... has a built-in AI which saves a lot of time in building filters for search.
On average, has 80-90% accuracy rate with the data retrieved, which is solid compared to other provider I had before. Overall, Cognism is a big part of my day to day activity for lead generation and business development.” (Source)
Other users describe their Cognism experience as frustrating:
Like this review by Marc: “Requested a data sample… a week later, still no data sample, but plenty of harassment by a sales rep. Repeated reminders were ignored.” They also flagged issues with mandatory annual contracts and excessive outreach, calling Cognism’s approach a sales trap. Reviews like this reflect a common concern. The product may be solid, but the sales process often leaves a bad impression. (Source)
Bottom Line
Despite the premium pricing, many users find it a worthy investment for compliant, accurate data in the European market.
4. Seamless.AI: AI-Powered Contact Discovery
Seamless.AI takes an AI-first approach to contact discovery, promising unlimited leads with real-time verification.
Its flexibility stands out, especially for larger teams, since Enterprise plans let you add unlimited users - no pricey per-seat fees like Lusha.
That said, reviews are mixed. Some users love how the AI uncovers unexpected leads, while others flag accuracy issues and pushy sales tactics.
Seamless.AI can deliver volume, but teams should double-check the data before relying on it for outreach.

Who Seamless.AI is best for
Teams wanting unlimited users and AI-driven prospecting.
Key Features:
AI-driven search with real-time verification
Chrome extension for web-based prospecting
Unlimited users on the Enterprise tier
Intent signals and job change alerts
CRM integrations and workflow automation
1.3B+ contact database claims
Seamless.AI Pricing:
Free – $0: 50 credits/month
Pro – Custom (typically $79+/user/month)
Enterprise – Custom, with unlimited users
Seamless.AI's pricing is customized and opaque, often requiring sales calls for details. Pricing for smaller teams may be less predictable.
Pros and Cons of Seamless.ai
Pros | Cons |
Unlimited users on Enterprise, making it cost-effective for larger teams | Inconsistent accuracy (60–75% reported by users) |
AI-powered search uncovers non-obvious prospects | Opaque pricing with sales calls required |
Large database coverage with 1.3B+ contacts | Pushy sales process during onboarding |
Add-on features like intent data and job change alerts | Chrome extension can be buggy at times |
What users are saying about Seamless AI
G2 rating: 4.5/5 (5,111 reviews). Some love it, others complain: “Great tool, but pricing is a nightmare.”
Users appreciate Seamless.AI for its time-saving features, easy CRM integration, and regularly updated contact data.
Rohan S., a Data Engineer, shared:
“As a data engineer , i have been using seamless AI for a few months , mainly to support our sales and marketing teams by providing clean, verified contact data. it integrates smoothly with our existing system , workflows. the interface is simple for everyone. i also like that is continuously updates record so we have to spend less time to cleaning up the data. this saves time and cost. its accurate and regularly updated contact data, easy to integration with CRM and workflow tools. and saves time and data validation.” Some caution remains around phone number accuracy, which can be inconsistent, so double-checking key contacts is recommended. (Source)
Bottom Line
Users praise the volume and flexibility it offers, but raise concerns about data consistency and sales process experience.
5. RocketReach: Professional Contact Finder
RocketReach gives you access to over 700 million profiles worldwide, with a sweet spot for technical professionals, perfect if you’re recruiting in tech.
Its browser extension makes finding contacts while browsing effortless, and the API lets dev teams integrate it into custom workflows.
Compared to Lusha, RocketReach offers more lookups per month and broader global coverage.
Data accuracy sits around 70-80%, similar to Lusha, but its focus on technical roles and flexible pricing makes it a solid choice for teams that need to source international tech talent without juggling multiple tools.

Who RocketReach is best for
Recruiters and teams targeting technical talent.
Key Features:
700M+ global profiles with a focus on technical talent
Strong coverage of developers, engineers, and technical roles
Browser extension for easy prospecting and contact retrieval
Bulk upload feature for importing large datasets
API access for custom integrations
Technographic data on higher-tier plans
RocketReach Pricing:
Essentials – $69/month: 100 lookups (email only)
Pro – $119/month: 250 lookups (email + phone)
Ultimate – $209/month: 500 lookups with integrations
Enterprise – Custom volume and features
While RocketReach’s pricing is more affordable compared to Lusha, it offers more lookups at each pricing tier and includes additional features like phone number lookups and custom integrations at higher levels.
Pros and Cons of RocketReach
Pros | Cons |
Large global database with extensive technical and developer profiles | Accuracy around 70–80%, similar to Lusha but below some competitors |
Flexible monthly plans tailored to different prospecting needs | Bulk uploads can be clunky for larger datasets |
API access for building custom workflows and integrations | Limited enrichment features compared to competitors |
Strong API documentation, making it developer-friendly | No engagement tools like email automation or sequencing |
User Sentiment:
G2 rating: 4.4/5 (989 reviews). Common feedback: “Great for emails, but phone numbers can be hit-or-miss.”
Users appreciate RocketReach for its ability to uncover emails, including personal addresses, and its strong focus on technical professionals.
Thomas D., President of a small business, shared: “RocketReach is an excellent resource for finding email addresses. In many cases they, also, identify personal emails. I have been using them for several years and my results have been very good.” (Source)
On the flip side, some users have experienced support issues.
Armando A., from Portugal, reported: “I filed a complaint with the company because LinkedIn blocked my account for using the RocketReach app. After I sent an email to Rocketreach about the situation, I was not at all satisfied with the response I received. It was just a brush-off. I sent a second email on 16 August and have not received any response. They just continue to charge me monthly for the service.” (Source)
Bottom Line
RocketReach is the best lusha alternative for small teams on a budget. While it doesn’t hit the mark on accurate contact data, it can be a good fit to fill data gaps if you're targeting technical role
6. LinkedIn Sales Navigator: Relationship-Based Selling
Sales Navigator gives you access to LinkedIn’s 900M+ profiles, complete with advanced search filters and real-time updates, perfect for teams that rely on relationship-driven selling.
Unlike Lusha’s static data, Sales Navigator tracks job changes as they happen and lets you use TeamLink for warm introductions.
The trade-off? You won’t get direct emails or phone numbers here. To fill that data gap, you’ll need a separate contact enrichment tool. Think of Sales Navigator as a powerful companion to Lusha, not a direct replacement.
Who LinkedIn Sales Navigator is best for
Enterprise sales teams focused on warm introductions
Key Features:
Real-time profile updates to track job changes and company moves
Advanced search filters for more precise targeting
TeamLink to map out mutual connections for warm introductions
InMail credits (50-150 per month) to send messages directly
Lead recommendations based on your criteria and LinkedIn activity
CRM activity sync for seamless workflow integration
LinkedIn Sales Navigator Pricing:
Core – $99/month
Professional – $119/month
Advanced – $149/month
Advanced Plus – $179/month with CRM sync
Pros and Cons of LinkedIn Sales Navigator
Pros | Cons |
Unmatched data freshness with real-time job change alerts | No email or phone number exports — requires pairing with another tool |
Powerful relationship mapping through TeamLink | High monthly cost compared to some alternatives |
Trusted LinkedIn environment with detailed professional profiles | InMail credits are limited, so you need to use them carefully |
InMail credits for direct outreach to key decision-makers | Requires a companion tool for full contact details (email/phone) |
What user are saying
G2 rating: 4.3/5 (2001 reviews): Users value Sales Navigator for its smart lead tracking, Lead Builder, and CRM integrations, which help teams stay on top of prospects and engage at the right time.
Jainil P., a Business Development Representative, shared:
“Stay on top of your pipeline with smart lead tracking that gives you friendly nudges whenever your prospects take meaningful actions—so you’re always ready to reach out at the perfect moment. Collaborate seamlessly with your team by sharing promising leads using the team edition, and keep everything organized by integrating with Microsoft Dynamics or Salesforce. Plus, with Lead Builder, you can easily save and bookmark interesting people and companies to revisit later.” (Source)
On the downside, some users find the interface overwhelming and note that building lists requires consistent effort.
Jainil added:
“While LinkedIn Sales Navigator offers valuable features, it comes with several drawbacks that users often point out. The interface can feel clunky and overwhelming, with too many buttons and filters, making the learning curve steeper than expected. It's not an automated solution—you’ll need to invest consistent effort to see results, which can be time-consuming, especially when building lists and refining searches. Some users also report glitches, like messages getting flagged as spam and never reaching their recipients. CRM integration isn’t seamless either, and syncing data may require an additional fee, adding to an already pricey tool. Overall, if you're seeking a streamlined, plug-and-play solution, this may not be it.” (Source)
Bottom Line
Sales Navigator excels at providing timing and context, but its lack of direct contact details means it’s best used in tandem with a contact enrichment tool like Lusha. If you’re focused on relationship-driven enterprise sales, it’s an essential tool that brings insights and engagement strategies that Lusha can’t match.
7. Lead411: Unlimited Access Platform
Lead411 makes prospecting simple with unlimited access to verified contacts.
Its database may be smaller than big players like ZoomInfo, with around 40 million contacts, but the triple verification system delivers solid results, and emails hit a 96% accuracy rate.
That’s a big step up from Lusha’s hit-or-miss approach. For US-based teams running high-volume outreach, Lead411 offers quality data without the hassle.
Who Lead411 is best for
US-focused teams running high-volume campaigns.
Key Features:
Unlimited email/phone viewing without running out of credits
Triple-verified data with 96% email accuracy
Bombora intent data available for annual plans
Sales triggers and job change alerts
Chrome extension for seamless prospecting
CRM integrations for easy data sync
Lead411 Pricing:
Basic Plus Unlimited – $99/user/month
Enterprise Limited – Custom pricing with intent data
Free 7-day trial with 50 exports
Lead411 offers a clear, transparent pricing structure without the need to worry about credit limits. For teams that need to view a high volume of contacts, this is a huge benefit compared to Lusha’s credit-based plans.
Pros and Cons of Lead411
Pros | Cons |
Unlimited access to email/phone data, no credit limits | Smaller database (40M contacts vs. 700M+ with other providers) |
Top-tier email accuracy (96% verified) | Limited international coverage compared to Lusha or others |
Transparent pricing with no surprises | Dated UI design may feel less modern |
Intent data available for high-volume prospecting | Some stale records still persist, affecting data freshness |
User Sentiment:
G2 rating: 4.5/5 (467 reviews): Users praise Lead411 for its accuracy, flexibility, and competitive pricing.
Peter J. A., an IT/MSP Sales Account Executive, shared:
“It has a simple UX, so there is minimal learning curve... very strong sorting (company size/$, titles, employees, geo-area/zip codes, etc.) to create targeted lists. You can also filter to ensure that the contacts you select have direct dial and mobile tel #'s. Month to month and annual options; with the annual subscriptions offering intent data as well. In terms of how robust the overall data and ability to massage it is, I would place Lead411 second only to ZoomInfo; but, ZoomInfo is a LOT more expensive and complex. For SMB-SME sales teams, Lead411 offers accurate data, and the ability to massage it into an actionable format at a very competitive price-point. I just started as lead salesperson for net-new B2B at my firm, and at my recommendation we have subscribed to Lead411.” (Source)
On the flip side, some users note the interface isn’t the most intuitive. Peter added that
“getting the most out of Lead411 does require a bit of tutoring,” so new users should be prepared to spend some time learning the system. (Source)
Bottom Line
Lead411 consistently receives praise for its unlimited access model and superior email accuracy. Users particularly appreciate the freedom to prospect without worrying about running out of credits.
8. Kaspr: European LinkedIn Extension
Kaspr, now part of Cognism, is built for GDPR-compliant LinkedIn prospecting in Europe. If Lusha struggles with EU data, Kaspr steps in with fast, reliable, and accurate contact information.
Its focus on compliance and LinkedIn-based prospecting makes it a solid choice for European sales teams that need quick, dependable data.
Paired with Cognism’s premium database, Kaspr offers better coverage and more precise results than many other tools targeting the European market.

Who Kaspr is best for
European SDRs doing LinkedIn-based prospecting.
Key Features:
One-click LinkedIn capture for quick prospecting
Unlimited B2B emails with paid plans
GDPR-compliant EU data, ensuring legal protection
Mobile numbers included for accurate outreach
API and Salesforce enrichment for data syncing
Credit sharing across teams for flexibility
Kaspr Pricing:
Free – $0: unlimited B2B email credits and a limited number of phone and direct email credits
Starter – $49/user/month: Unlimited B2B emails, 100 phone credits
Business – $79/user/month: 200 phone credits
Organization – Custom pricing for advanced features and higher limits.
Kaspr offers transparent, tiered pricing with a generous free plan to get started and flexible credit options for growing teams.
Pros and Cons of Kaspr
Pros | Cons |
Fast LinkedIn extraction for efficient prospecting | Limited outside LinkedIn - mostly focused on LinkedIn-based data |
Strong EU compliance with GDPR safeguards | Smaller global database compared to competitors |
Unlimited B2B emails for less credit stress | No intent data unless on the Enterprise plan |
Backed by Cognism data quality, offering verified contacts | Occasional bugs reported, especially in browser extension |
User Sentiment:
G2 rating: 4.4/5 (827 reviews): EU users appreciate its mobile number accuracy, although data freshness and occasional bugs are noted.
Users praise Kaspr for its speed and reliability in extracting verified LinkedIn contacts.
Saqib I., an RCM Executive, shared:
“Kaspr makes it easy to extract verified contact details from LinkedIn, speeding up our outreach process.” (Source)
On the downside, some users have had issues with billing and refunds.
Anatolii U., a CEO, reported:
“There’s no way to unsubscribe for the next month without getting charged, and they refused a refund for a service I didn’t use. I subscribed and tried to cancel the subscription but there were no the way to unsubscribe. I asked the support but they started to say about this is against their policy. When they charged from my bank for a new month, I reached out to this support one more time on the chat that I don't use their tool, they refused to make a refund for the month that I didn't use at all. I'm going to submit this request to my bank. Anyway, this tool is terrible.” (Source)
Bottom Line
Kaspr clearly beats Lusha when it comes to European LinkedIn prospecting, thanks to its Cognism-powered data and solid GDPR compliance. It’s fast, reliable, and delivers accurate contacts for EU-focused outreach. The trade-offs? It’s mostly tied to LinkedIn and doesn’t include intent data on standard plans.
9. UpLead: Quality-Guaranteed Data
UpLead shines because it guarantees data you can actually use, offering 95% accuracy and automatic credit refunds for any bounces.
Unlike Lusha, where wasted credits on bad contacts are all too common, UpLead makes sure you only pay for leads that work.
For sales teams that care about quality over quantity, it’s a reliable choice - clean, verified contacts that save time and prevent wasted effort.
If precision matters to your outreach, UpLead is worth a close look.

Who UpLead is best for
Teams prioritizing accuracy over volume.
Key Features:
95% accuracy guarantee with automatic refunds for bad data
Real-time verification for fresh contacts
50M+ contact database covering a wide range of industries
Buyer intent signals available on the Pro plan
Technographic data for deeper insights
Chrome extension for seamless prospecting
UpLead Pricing:
Essentials – $99/month: 170 credits
Plus – $199/month: 400 credits with enrichment and technographics
Professional – Custom annual pricing with intent data
UpLead’s pricing model is transparent and offers a clear credit system. It’s designed to fit teams focused on high-quality contacts rather than bulk outreach.
Pros and Cons of UpLead
Pros | Cons |
Guaranteed accuracy with refunds for bad data | Higher cost per contact than competitors like Lusha |
Clean, modern interface that's easy to navigate | Smaller database than larger players like ZoomInfo |
Strong verification process for reliable contacts | Annual commitment required for the Professional plan |
Transparent credit system, so you know exactly what you're paying for | Limited engagement features, primarily focused on data enrichment |
User Sentiment:
G2 rating: 4.7/5 (803 appraisals). Users praise UpLead for its accuracy and reliability in B2B lead generation, though some users flag limited features and higher costs.
Glenn L., CEO of a small business, shared:
"UpLead makes it easy to search and source people, companies, competitors, new products and all relevant contact information, online, quickly and easily, along with commercial details about the prospects you are chasing." (Source)
On the flip side, some users note performance issues with complex searches on older systems, which can slow down the platform.
James F. Network Engineer in a big Enterprise, shared:
"The saved searches mostly come out with inconsistent results and midway amendments to queries are hard. I end up having to recreate them. The response rate is 30% and correctness is approximately 70% and also the search and filter abilities can be more potent."(source)
Bottom Line
UpLead users appreciate the refundable credits and guaranteed accuracy, making it a better fit for teams who want to avoid the risk of wasted resources. It's a solid Lusha alternative.
10. Snov.io: Email-First Outreach Platform
Snov.io pairs email discovery with built-in drip campaigns, combining Lusha-style contact finding with simple email automation.
Teams can manage outreach from lead discovery to follow-up in a single platform, keeping costs low and workflows streamlined.
It’s a solid pick for teams focused on email outreach who want an affordable, all-in-one solution.

Who Snov.io is best for
Budget-conscious teams doing email-heavy prospecting.
Key Features:
Email finder with 7-tier verification for better accuracy
Built-in drip campaigns for seamless email follow-ups
Email warm-up tool to improve deliverability rates
LinkedIn prospecting extension for multi-channel outreach
Basic CRM to manage contacts and campaigns
Deliverability tools to ensure your emails land in inboxes
Snov.io Pricing:
Starter – $29/month: 1,000 credits
Pro – $74/month: 5,000 credits, advanced features
Custom Ultra – Includes everything you need to scale
Snov.io provides an affordable pricing model, giving users more credits per dollar than many competitors, including Lusha.
Pros and Cons of Snov.io
Pros | Cons |
Affordable all-in-one solution that combines discovery, verification, and outreach tools | Very limited phone data - focuses mostly on emails |
Strong email verification with 7-tier validation for better accuracy | Credits expire monthly, which may not suit teams with slower outreach cycles |
Built-in outreach tools that eliminate the need for additional subscriptions | Basic compared to specialists - lacks some advanced features found in more specialized tools |
Deliverability features to help ensure better inbox placement | Support can be slow at times, leading to delays in resolving issues |
User Sentiment:
G2 rating: 4.6/5 (453 reviews). Typical comment: “Great for email, but lacking for phones.”
Pierluca P., CEO of a small business, shared:
“What I like most about Snovio is its simplicity combined with powerful features. It has streamlined our entire outbound workflow — from finding leads to automating follow-ups — in a way that’s both intuitive and effective. The quality of data and the flexibility of the tools are top-notch. On top of that, the support from Daniela Mitsitsei has been outstanding — she’s been incredibly helpful, knowledgeable, and proactive throughout our experience with Snovio.” (Source)
On the downside, some users report post-purchase support issues. Gregg Dillon from the UK noted:
“Snov.io support is great before you buy but after you get no support. You speak to a bot on the chat and get given the same answers each time even though they don't make sense. Will be going to email hunter.” (Source)
Bottom Line
Snov.io stands out for teams that rely heavily on email outreach, offering strong automation, reliable verification, and the convenience of multiple tools in one platform, all at a budget-friendly price.
11. Clearbit (Breeze Intelligence): Real-Time Enrichment
Rebranded as Breeze Intelligence after HubSpot's acquisition, this tool focuses on real-time enrichment rather than traditional list-building.
While it isn’t a direct Lusha replacement, it shines in inbound marketing by enriching leads automatically as they engage, especially for teams already using HubSpot.

Who Clearbit is best for
HubSpot users needing automatic lead enrichment.
Key Features:
Real-time form enrichment to shorten forms and increase conversions
Website visitor identification to track anonymous visitors
Company insights and technographics to understand client needs
Custom audience building for more targeted marketing
Slack alerts for key visitors and opportunities
Native HubSpot integration for seamless workflows
Breeze Intelligence Pricing:
Available only with HubSpot Marketing Hub
Typically $12,000–$30,000/year
No standalone option
Pros and Cons of Breeze Intelligence
Pros | Cons |
Seamless HubSpot integration to enrich leads without manual intervention | HubSpot-only - does not work outside HubSpot, limiting flexibility |
Improves form conversion by 20–40% through automatic lead enrichment | Limited contact details - focused more on company-level insights than individual contact information |
Provides real-time enrichment of incoming leads | Expensive annual pricing, typically starting at $12K/year |
Delivers strong company-level data for better prospect understanding | Not suitable for outbound prospecting, more designed for inbound lead management |
User Sentiment:
G2 rating: 4.4/5 (626 reviews). Marketing teams like the accuracy but criticize the cost and HubSpot lock-in.
Users like Breeze for its intuitive, SMB-friendly design and time-saving features.
Aaron H., Marketing Manager at a mid-sized company, shared:
“The free onboarding and training helped us get started quickly. Breeze feels like it was made for small teams intuitive, helpful and powerful. We especially love the answer reuse feature and the automated suggestions that save time and reduce errors.” (Source)
On the downside, some users feel the interface could use a modern refresh, though it remains fully functional.
Users rave about how Breeze makes inbound lead conversion more efficient. The real-time form enrichment and visitor identification improve conversion rates significantly, which many Lusha users find lacking in comparison.
Bottom Line
Breeze Intelligence (formerly Clearbit) is built for HubSpot users. It’s not meant to replace Lusha for outbound prospecting, but for inbound marketing and website visitor tracking, it shines. If your focus is inbound and you rely on HubSpot, Breeze Intelligence is a smart way to level up your lead management.
12. Dealfront: European Website Intelligence
Dealfront, formed by merging Leadfeeder and Echobot, offers website visitor identification along with GDPR-compliant data.
It combines Lusha’s contact discovery with website analytics, tailored specifically for the European market.

Who Dealfront is best for
European companies combining visitor tracking with prospecting.
Key Features:
Website visitor identification to see which companies are interested in your solution
GDPR-compliant database to ensure full compliance in European markets
Strong DACH (Germany, Austria, Switzerland) region coverage
Intent signals based on website visits, helping target warm leads
Company firmographics to provide deeper insights into prospects
Browser extension for easy prospecting
Dealfront Pricing:
Starter plans from €99/month
Enterprise bundles range from €10,000–30,000/year
Modular pricing based on the features selected
Pros and Cons of Dealfront
Pros | Cons |
Identifies anonymous website visitors | Weak on individual contact details |
Fully GDPR-compliant, strong EU coverage | Credit-based export system can feel restrictive |
Good integrations (HubSpot, browser extension) | Higher cost for the full suite |
Strong support and onboarding for EU users | Database not always 100% up to date |
User Sentiment:
G2 rating: 4.5/5 (111 reviews). Users like the visitor insights but note missing contact data.
We started using Dealfront because of the Target feature… the Leadfeeder visitor tracking is promising. Quick help from support was a plus.” – Katja P., G2
“As a German company, it’s important to handle data carefully… Dealfront offers many advantages compared to ‘data pirates’. The HubSpot integration works well, even if some details are missing.” –Verified User, G2
Bottom Line
Dealfront is a strong choice for European teams wanting GDPR-compliant prospecting combined with website visitor intelligence. Its deep focus on the DACH market gives insights Lusha can’t match, making it ideal for targeting warm leads.
Why FullEnrich Is the Best Lusha Alternative
1. 85%+ Contact Coverage vs. Lusha's 60-70%
Lusha pulls from a single database, meaning when they don’t have a match, you're stuck.
On the other hand, FullEnrich employs a waterfall enrichment process, checking 20+ premium providers sequentially. This approach results in 85%+ coverage, nearly doubling Lusha's 60-70% match rate.

2. Better Value at Scale
While Lusha starts at $29.90/month, it only gives you 250 credits that expire monthly. For teams engaging in high-volume outreach, this can quickly lead to credit exhaustion and hidden costs.
In comparison, FullEnrich starts at $29/month for 500 credits, which roll over for up to 3 months. Plus, unlimited users on Pro plans ensure that your entire team can access premium data without per-user fees.

3. Triple-Verified Accuracy
Lusha users often report accuracy issues - one G2 reviewer even mentioned needing to "double-check emails and numbers." In contrast, FullEnrich runs every contact through triple verification, including catch-all detection, and prioritizes mobile numbers over switchboards.
This leads to bounce rates staying below 1%, whereas Lusha users often face 30-40% inaccuracy on certain datasets.

4. Built for Teams, Not Just Individuals
While Lusha works well for solo SDRs focused on LinkedIn prospecting, it struggles with bulk enrichment and team workflows.
FullEnrich, however, is designed for teams. It supports CSV uploads, real-time API enrichment, and comes with native integrations for tools like Salesforce, HubSpot, Clay, and major automation platforms.
Additionally, unlimited seats mean your entire team can access premium data without the need for per-user fees.

FullEnrich stands out for teams that care about data quality and coverage. Its multi-vendor waterfall approach hits 85%+ match rates with triple verification, closing the gaps you’ll often find in Lusha.
At $29/month with credit rollover, it’s flexible without the restrictions of Lusha’s monthly limits.
For modern SDR teams that can’t afford missed opportunities, it’s the smarter alternative.
Ready to build a healthier pipeline?
👉 Try FullEnrich with 50 free credits today — or Book a Demo to see how waterfall enrichment outperforms Lusha.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is better than Lusha?
For most teams, FullEnrich offers superior coverage (85%+ vs. 60-70%), Apollo.io provides more features for the price, and Cognism excels in European data. The best choice depends on your team's priorities: FullEnrich for maximum contact coverage, Apollo.io for an all-in-one platform, and Cognism for GDPR-compliant European data.
Is there a free version of Lusha?
Yes, Lusha offers a free plan with 40 credits per month. However, alternatives like Apollo.io (100 credits), Hunter.io (25 searches), and PeopleDataLabs (100 API calls) offer more generous free plans, making them better options for meaningful prospecting.
Is Apollo or Lusha better?
Apollo.io generally offers better value. You get 10x more credits (2,500 vs. 250 for the same price) and access to built-in sequencing, dialers, and automation tools. While Lusha is easier for quick LinkedIn lookups, Apollo’s integrated platform provides more functionality, though it requires a learning curve.
Which is better, Lusha or RocketReach?
RocketReach provides more lookups per dollar, better global coverage, and flexibility with its API and bulk upload features. Lusha is simpler for LinkedIn prospecting, while RocketReach is a better choice for varied prospecting needs, especially in technical recruiting.
Does Lusha have verified emails?
Lusha claims to verify emails, but user reports often show only 60-70% accuracy, leading to significant bounces. For more reliable verified data, alternatives like FullEnrich (triple verification), UpLead (95% accuracy guarantee), or Hunter.io offer better results.
What is the difference between Lusha and lead scoring tools?
Lusha focuses on contact discovery, finding emails and phone numbers, while lead scoring tools like Leadfeeder or 6sense analyze buyer behavior to prioritize prospects. Many teams use both: lead scoring to identify potential buyers and enrichment tools like Lusha to find their contact details.
Can I use Lusha without LinkedIn?
Yes, Lusha offers a web app for searching contacts without LinkedIn, but it's less effective than the Chrome extension. Alternatives like Apollo.io or FullEnrich offer more robust standalone search features for those who don't rely on LinkedIn.
Other Articles
Cost Per Opportunity (CPO): A Comprehensive Guide for Businesses
Discover how Cost Per Opportunity (CPO) acts as a key performance indicator in business strategy, offering insights into marketing and sales effectiveness.
Cost Per Sale Uncovered: Efficiency, Calculation, and Optimization in Digital Advertising
Explore Cost Per Sale (CPS) in digital advertising, its calculation and optimization for efficient ad strategies and increased profitability.
Customer Segmentation: Essential Guide for Effective Business Strategies
Discover how Customer Segmentation can drive your business strategy. Learn key concepts, benefits, and practical application tips.