Verified 14 October 2026

FullEnrich vs Cognism: which one fits your GTM workflow better?

FullEnrich and Cognism can both put B2B emails and mobile numbers into your sales stack, but they solve the problem in very different ways.We compared how each product handles prospecting, enrichment, data verification, pricing, integrations and automation, including where Cognism is genuinely stronger and where FullEnrich makes more sense.
Test FullEnrich free Compare FullEnrich and Cognism

50 free credits · No card required

Trusted by the fastest growing B2B companies

4.8 on G2 G2
AWSMongoDBJ.P. MorganDeelKlaviyoElasticsearchAutodeskSalesforceHubSpotUber
The answer

Which one should you choose: FullEnrich or Cognism?

Choose FullEnrich if enrichment is the job. Choose Cognism if your reps need a broader prospecting workspace around the data.Both can put B2B contact data into your GTM workflow, but they are built around different jobs.

Choose Cognism if you need:
A rep-facing prospecting workspace
LinkedIn and Sales Navigator workflows
Intent data and buying signals alongside contact data
Phone-verified Diamond Data for priority prospects
Native CRM and sales-tool workflows

Cognism is the stronger fit when SDRs are actively searching for prospects and want the research, contact data and sales signals in one place.

Choose FullEnrich if you need:
Waterfall enrichment across 25+ data sources
Bulk enrichment for lists and CRM records
API, automation and MCP workflows
Unlimited users without adding seat costs
Verified data before you are charged for the result

FullEnrich makes more sense when you already know who you want to enrich and need reliable contact data to move through the rest of your GTM stack.

Either way, the decision belongs to the same list. Run 100 to 250 contacts through both, call them, and compare what came back.
Start enriching your list with 50 free credits
From Cognism’s public reviews

Why teams move more of their enrichment to FullEnrich

Across Cognism’s public G2 reviews, the same friction points come up repeatedly: coverage gets thinner outside core European markets, seat-based access becomes harder to scale and enrichment workflows become more constrained as teams move beyond manual prospecting.Those are also the situations where FullEnrich tends to make more sense as the enrichment layer, and where teams start looking at Cognism alternatives.

Global coverage becomes more important

FullEnrich checks each contact across 25+ data sources. Cognism reviewers praise its European coverage, while reported gaps appear more often across APAC, the Middle East, LATAM and smaller markets.

"Coverage also thins out noticeably outside Europe…"
Maxime S., Mid-Market, G2, July 2026

More people need access to the data

FullEnrich includes unlimited users on a shared credit pool, so another SDR or RevOps user is not a seat decision. Seat licensing is a recurring theme in Cognism reviews, where sales teams start rationing seats.

"Per user seat licenses rather than just charging utilization makes it harder than it should be to work with."
Alistair A., Mid-Market, G2, March 2026

Enrichment moves beyond manual prospecting

FullEnrich matters more when enrichment is something the GTM stack calls automatically: CSV, CRM workflows, APIs, Clay, n8n or MCP-compatible agents, rather than something a rep does by hand in a browser.

"The limit on exporting only 25 contacts at a time into a list is inconvenient."
Josh P., G2, November 2025
Cognism holds a 4.5/5 on G2 across 1,363 reviews. That rating reflects a platform its users rate highly on ease of use, support and European mobiles. The patterns above explain why some of those same teams still add an enrichment layer underneath it.
Features

What are the key differences between FullEnrich and Cognism?

FullEnrich leads on waterfall enrichment, verification, bulk workflows and AI-native access. Cognism leads on rep-facing prospecting and browser-based workflows.

Database or waterfall
FullEnrich advantage

FullEnrich checks 25+ data providers in sequence and stops at the first result that passes verification. Cognism answers from a database it has already assembled and refreshed.

Hunter No match
Wiza No match
ContactOut Verified
+1 (628) 555-0147

Email verification
FullEnrich wins

FullEnrich checks syntax, domain, MX, SMTP and catch-all status, then grades each email. Cognism verifies inside its database but documents no per-email check at reveal time.

Elena Marchetti
example.com
elena.marchetti@example.com
Verified, 3/3 checks passed
Synthetic example data

Search and list building
Cognism wins

FullEnrich Search finds people and companies and sends them straight into enrichment. Cognism goes deeper for rep-led prospecting, with filters for revenue, headcount, work history, technologies, hiring and funding.

Head of Sales United States Example list
EM
Elena Marchetti Head of Sales
Harbor Analytics
JO
James Okonkwo Head of Sales
Brightline Labs
LB
Lars Boersma Head of Sales
Meridian Software
Synthetic example data

Bulk CSV enrichment
FullEnrich wins

FullEnrich enriches from a name and company or a LinkedIn URL, and misses cost nothing. Cognism requires an email as the matching key, caps uploads at 10,000 rows and drops unmatched contacts.

Browser extension
Cognism wins

FullEnrich does not offer a browser extension. Cognism’s works across LinkedIn, Sales Navigator, Recruiter, company websites and supported sales tools, the stronger option for prospecting in the browser.

FullEnrich: not offered

Cognism: both tiers, 40,000 Web Store users

MCP for AI assistants
Depends on workflow

Both ship an MCP server. FullEnrich’s comes on every plan, including the free trial, so an AI assistant can request verified contact data before anyone signs a contract. Cognism’s comes with its Standard and Pro packages.

Enrichment layer: FullEnrich · waterfall, verification, bulk lists, API and agents
Sales intelligence platform: Cognism · database, extension, signals, intent, native CRM
Feature FullEnrich Test free Cognism Practical difference Verdict
Data & enrichment
Enrichment model 25+ providers in sequence, result verified. Separate Search index: 800M people, 50M companies.
Live
 Answers from a pre-assembled database: own capture, public sources, research, partnerships, third-party vendors.
Live
 FullEnrich keeps looking when one source comes up empty.
FullEnrich wins
Work email enrichment & billing 1 credit per work email. Misses and invalid cost 0, catch-all costs 1.
Live
 1 credit reveals the contact and whatever fields Cognism holds for it.
Live
 FullEnrich charges for the data point. Cognism charges for the contact reveal.
FullEnrich wins
Email verification Syntax, domain, MX, SMTP/ping and catch-all checks, then a grade with published bounce ranges.
Live
 Verifies and refreshes inside the database. Senior contacts marketed as refreshed every 30 days.
Live
 FullEnrich verifies at request time. Cognism documents no per-email check at reveal.
FullEnrich wins
Mobile enrichment 10 credits per verified mobile, landlines free. Line-type, out-of-service and pattern checks in 40+ countries, owner matching in the US and Canada.
Live
 Both tiers. Pro adds the premium verified-mobile filter and Diamond subset.
Live
 FullEnrich checks every mobile it bills. Cognism adds a human-verified subset.
FullEnrich wins
Mobile verification on demand No human-calling service. Every mobile passes automated checks before billing.
Not offered
 Pro: human verification through Click Verify and Diamonds-on-Demand. Published success rates 10 to 15% UK, 15 to 20% US.
Live
 Cognism only. A person calls to confirm the number on request.
Cognism wins
Bulk CSV enrichment Every plan. Starts from name plus company or a LinkedIn URL. No published row cap. Misses cost 0.
Live
 Up to 10,000 rows. Email required as the matching key. Unmatched rows dropped.
Live
 A CRM export with missing emails still works on FullEnrich.
FullEnrich wins
Prospecting & rep workflow
Search and list building Every plan: 800M people, 50M companies, 15+ filters including technology, saved searches, direct handoff into enrichment.
Live
 Revenue, headcount, work history, technology, AI search, personas and Net New filtering.
Live
 Cognism gives more context before the list exists. FullEnrich finds and enriches in one step.
Cognism wins
Browser extension No native browser extension currently offered.
Not offered
 LinkedIn, Sales Navigator, Recruiter, company websites, Outreach and HubSpot. Reveal, save, export and verify in-flow.
Live
 Cognism removes clicks for profile-by-profile prospecting. FullEnrich works through Search, CSV, API or automation.
Cognism wins
Intent data No native intent product.
Not offered
 Pro: Bombora Company Surge, up to 12 topics from a library of 11,000+.
Live
 Cognism only. Intent answers who might be in market, not the contact data.
Cognism wins
Hiring, funding & job-change signals No dedicated hiring, funding or job-change feed.
Not offered
 Hiring, Funding & M&A and Job Change signals across the prospecting product.
Live
 Cognism only. For motions that start from an event, before the list exists.
Cognism wins
Exports CSV from lists and Search, free re-exports, no published cap. MCP exports to CSV too.
Live
 Up to 10,000 from Search, 1,000 per action from contact views. Unrevealed exports cost a credit.
Live
 FullEnrich treats moving data out as part of the workflow.
FullEnrich wins
Platform, API & AI
API Every plan including Free. Enrich, Search and Reverse APIs, async webhooks. 60 requests a minute, 100 contacts each.
Live
 Included in Standard and Pro. Search and count companies and people, then reveal contacts. 500 requests a minute per operation.
Live
 API on every FullEnrich plan. Cognism publishes the higher request-rate ceiling.
FullEnrich for access, Cognism for RPM
MCP for AI assistants Native MCP on every plan including Free. ChatGPT, Claude, Manus, Claude Code and compatible agent clients.
Live
 Native MCP on Standard and Pro. Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor and other MCP clients, on the platform’s credits.
Live
 Both ship MCP. FullEnrich’s works from the free trial, Cognism’s after a sales call.
FullEnrich to try it free
Users and seats Unlimited users on every plan sharing one credit pool.
Live
 Standard and Pro include 5 seats. Additional seat pricing not published.
Live
 No seat decision on FullEnrich when more of the team needs access.
FullEnrich wins
Free access 50 credits, no card, valid 30 days. API and MCP included.
Live
 No free plan published. A free data-sample request instead.
Not offered
 FullEnrich can be tested before procurement gets involved.
FullEnrich wins
Interface languages English interface.
Not offered
 French and German interfaces alongside English. The contact data is not translated.
Live
 Cognism only, for teams that want the interface localised.
Cognism wins
FullEnrich is built for enrichment across 25+ providers, bulk workflows, API and a native MCP server, the shape RevOps teams tend to need. Cognism is the broader rep-facing platform around its database.
Data quality

Which has better data quality: FullEnrich or Cognism?

Vendor accuracy claims are hard to compare because everyone measures them differently.The main difference is structural: Cognism relies on its own database. FullEnrich waterfalls across 25+ providers to maximise the chance of finding a verified email or mobile.For GTM teams, that means more shots at finding the right data instead of relying on one database being complete.

How do FullEnrich and Cognism differ on contact coverage?

Coverage isn’t how many contacts a vendor says are in its database. It’s how many people on your actual list you can turn into a reachable email or mobile for your reps.On the same 1,000-contact list, one data source reaches 530 contacts; the FullEnrich waterfall reaches 910. The advantage is in recovering the misses a single source leaves behind.

The same list · 1,000 contacts

One data vendor FullEnrich waterfall

Reachable contacts

530
910

+380 contacts

Sales pipeline

159
273

+114 opportunities

Closed deals

53
91

+38 deals

$50,000

current revenue / month

+$0

added with FullEnrich · $429,600 a year

Same team, same close rate · 91% of your list reachable instead of 53%

How do FullEnrich and Cognism verify contact data?

FullEnrich

FullEnrich verifies before delivery

  • Syntax, domain, MX and SMTP checks
  • Catch-all resolution
  • Confidence grades with published bounce ranges

Operator takeaway: you know how hard an email is to use before it enters the sequence.

FullEnrich

FullEnrich checks the number, not just whether one exists

  • Separates mobiles from landlines
  • Removes detectable inactive numbers
  • Owner-name matching in the US and Canada

Operator takeaway: fewer credits get wasted on numbers that are technically present but useless to an SDR.

Cognism

Cognism adds human verification

Cognism researchers call its Diamond subset and confirm who answers. It also offers on-demand verification on Pro.

Its published 1,000-mobile test reported the right person answering 45% of verified mobiles against 18% of standard mobiles.

Operator takeaway: for a few high-value accounts, Cognism has a verification method FullEnrich does not offer.

Test FullEnrich with 50 free credits
Customer results

How Deel improved contact coverage with FullEnrich

Deel piloted FullEnrich with more than 70 sales reps while scaling a global sales organisation across 80 countries.

Pilot with more than 70 reps
Deel
When you’re scaling a 1,000-person sales org across 80 countries, bad data kills your pipeline.
OE
Olivier Elbaz Global Head of Expansion, Deel

2.4×

more mobile numbers found

6% → 30%

connect rate during the pilot

5×

fewer invalid numbers

The takeaway

Judge the data by the conversations it helps your team start.

FullEnrich-published customer results. The prior provider was not identified, so this pilot is not a benchmark against Cognism. Read the published testimonial
Run your own pilot, 50 credits free
Pricing and credits

How do FullEnrich and Cognism pricing and credits compare?

FullEnrich starts at $29 a month on published plans, includes unlimited users, and charges 1 credit for a work email, 10 for a mobile and 0 for a miss. Cognism does not publish list pricing and sells quote-based packages with 5 seats included and credits tied to contact reveals.On 8 September 2026, Vendr reported a median Cognism contract of $36,000 a year across about 109 purchases, with reported deals ranging from $17,832 to $93,209.For a GTM team, FullEnrich is easier to budget around actual enrichment usage; Cognism is a larger platform commitment.

Factor FullEnrich See FullEnrich plans Cognism Verdict
Free usage 50 credits once, no card, valid 30 days, plus 50 per teammate invited. API and MCP included. No free plan or trial credits published. A "Free data sample" form handled by sales.
FullEnrich wins
Published price Every tier on the pricing page, plus a machine-readable pricing.md. None. No amount on the English, French or German pricing page; every button leads to a sales call.
FullEnrich wins
Packages and seats One Pro plan on a credit slider. Unlimited users on every plan. Standard and Pro, 5 seats each. Extra seat pricing not published.
FullEnrich wins
Entry cost $29 a month for 500 credits, or $26 a month billed yearly. Quote only. Third-party estimate: lowest Vendr contract $17,832 a year (Vendr, 8 September 2026).
Lower entry cost: FullEnrich
Typical contract No contract figure: the tier is the price. $55 a month for 1,000 credits by default. Third-party estimate: $36,000 median a year across about 109 purchases, from $17,832 to $93,209 (Vendr, 8 September 2026).
What a credit buys 1 credit a work email, 10 a mobile, 3 a personal email, 1 a reverse lookup, 0.25 a Search export. 1 credit per revealed contact, whatever fields it carries. Re-views free; a job change costs a credit again.
Depends on workflow
Failed lookup 0 credits everywhere. Landlines, out-of-service lines and invalid emails are also 0. 0. Unmatched CSV rows are dropped without being listed. In the API, credits go only on revealed contacts.
FullEnrich wins
Human-verified mobiles Not offered. Line-type, service-status and, in the US and Canada, owner-name checks. Included in the same 1 credit. Verification on demand is Pro-only, no per-request cost published.
Cognism wins
Intent data Not offered. Pro: up to 12 topics from a library of over 11,000. Extra topics, third-party estimate $1,600 to $6,000 a year (Amplemarket, 29 April 2026).
Cognism wins
Add-ons None on Pro. Enterprise adds SSO, custom rate limits and an account manager. CRM Enrichment and Data-as-a-Service sold as add-ons. API and MCP come with Standard and Pro.
Credit expiry and rollover Credits roll over 3 months monthly, 12 months yearly. Not published. Reveals last the current contract period, no expiry or rollover clause.
FullEnrich wins
Contract and cancellation Monthly plans cancel any time and run to the end of the cycle. Annual plans exist. Not published. Contract length and notice period are set in the signed agreement, not on the site.
FullEnrich wins
Refund on bad data Not documented. Credits are consumed only when a verified result is found. Not documented on any Cognism page.
Ten reps, 1,000 emails and 500 mobiles a month 6,000 credits: the 10,000-credit tier at $499 a month, or $454 billed yearly, all ten reps included. Quote required: ten reps exceed the 5 seats. Third-party estimate: about $30,000 a year on Standard, $50,000 on Pro (Amplemarket, 29 April 2026).
A list price against a quote
Integrations

Which has better integrations: FullEnrich or Cognism?

FullEnrich is easier to plug into automated and agentic GTM workflows. Its REST API and MCP server are available on every plan, and it connects into tools such as HubSpot, Clay, n8n, Make and Zapier.Cognism has the broader native sales-tool footprint. It integrates directly with Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Microsoft Dynamics, Outreach, Salesloft and Bullhorn, with two-way CRM workflows where supported.

Cognism: best for native sales-tool integrations
Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Dynamics and Bullhorn
Outreach and Salesloft workflows
Browser extension inside LinkedIn and Sales Navigator and supported sales tools
Data delivery into Snowflake, S3, Google Cloud, Databricks and SFTP
FullEnrich: best for programmable integrations
API on every plan, including Free
Native MCP for AI agents and assistants
Clay, n8n, Make and Zapier
HubSpot push for CRM delivery
Integration FullEnrich Cognism Practical difference
HubSpot
Native in both
 Native on every plan. Push people and companies, review duplicates, map fields.
Native
 Native. Two-way sync, selective field import and CRM workflows inside HubSpot.
Native
 FullEnrich pushes records in. Cognism goes further if reps work inside HubSpot.
Salesforce
Native in Cognism
 Via automation: Zapier, Make, n8n or the API. No native integration.
Via automation
 Native. Sync leads, contacts and accounts, with CRM Enrichment available for Salesforce.
Native
 FullEnrich treats Salesforce as a destination. Cognism fits if Salesforce is the rep workspace.
Pipedrive, Bullhorn & Microsoft Dynamics
Cognism native
 Pipedrive in early access. Bullhorn and Dynamics through automation, no native integration.
Early access
 Native. All three are supported directly.
Native
 FullEnrich feeds them through middleware. Cognism connects directly.
Outreach & Salesloft
Cognism native
 Early access. Reachable through the automation stack meanwhile.
Early access
 Native. Save and export into both; Outreach also works directly with Cognism’s browser extension.
Native
 FullEnrich feeds the sequencer. Cognism puts contact data inside it.
Clay
FullEnrich native
 Native data provider. Run FullEnrich directly inside Clay tables and send results through the waterfall.
Native
 No native Clay integration published.
Not available
 If Clay is your control plane, FullEnrich is the enrichment step, no handoff.
Zapier, Make & n8n
Automation
 All three. Trigger enrichment and move results across the GTM stack.
Native
 Zapier available. No equivalent native Make or n8n integration is currently published.
Native
 FullEnrich leaves RevOps free to orchestrate enrichment through any of the three.
API
API in both
 Every plan including Free. Search, enrich, reverse lookup, webhooks, batch. 60 requests a minute, 100 contacts each.
API
 Included in Standard and Pro. 500 requests a minute per operation.
API
 The FullEnrich API starts on any plan, including free. Cognism has the higher ceiling, on a paid package.
MCP / AI agents
Native in both
 Native on every plan. Assistants and agents call FullEnrich for search and enrichment.
Native
 Native on Standard and Pro, for Claude, ChatGPT and Cursor.
Native
 Both plug into an AI assistant. FullEnrich’s works from the free trial.
Warehouse delivery
Cognism native
 Via API or automation. FullEnrich does not sell a dedicated warehouse-delivery product.
Via automation
 Native Data-as-a-Service. Scheduled batches to Snowflake, S3, Google Cloud, Databricks or SFTP.
Native
 FullEnrich suits live workflows. Cognism suits scheduled bulk delivery to the warehouse.
Browser extension
Cognism native
 Not available. FullEnrich workflows start from Search, lists, API, automation or MCP instead.
Not available
 Native. Works in LinkedIn, Sales Navigator, Recruiter, company websites and supported sales tools.
Native
 FullEnrich moves data through the stack. Cognism reveals contacts one profile at a time.

The practical difference

Cognism connects natively to more CRMs and sequencers, both ways. FullEnrich places enrichment inside an API, an automation platform or an AI assistant, on every plan.

Security and compliance

Which has better security and compliance: FullEnrich or Cognism?

FullEnrich is SOC 2 Type II compliant, hosts in the EU, acts as a processor on customer instructions and deletes enriched results after three months.Cognism has the broader certification stack: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022 and ISO 27701. It also screens mobile data against national do-not-call registers.For procurement, Cognism has more boxes ticked on paper. For day-to-day data handling, FullEnrich keeps things simpler: shorter retention, EU hosting and no enrichment database sitting behind the workflow.

FullEnrich security
SOC 2 Type II
GDPR
CCPA
Trust Centre
Requirement FullEnrich Cognism
Certifications SOC 2 Type II, report requestable through the trust centre. No ISO certification; the trust page cites its host’s. ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701 and SOC 2 Type II (audit period to 31 October 2025, announced February 2026). Certificates gated behind "Request access".
Role under the GDPR Processor for enrichment on the customer’s instructions. Controller for its own Search index, on legitimate interest. Controller of its own database on legitimate interest, with assessments and Article 14 notification. Processor for customer data sent for enrichment.
CCPA "Do not sell my information" portal at fullenrich.com/optout. US state privacy policy, California data broker registration, toll-free CCPA number, ICO registration in the UK.
Hosting and residency DigitalOcean, data hosted in the European Union. Head office in the United States, transfers under SCCs. AWS eu-west-1 in Ireland. "We generally keep the data collected inside the European Economic Area".
DPA and sub-processors DPA dated 2 August 2026, SCCs, 8 days’ notice on a new sub-processor. One public list of seven, verification vendors included. Public DPA, EU SCCs plus Swiss and UK addenda, 15 days to object. Two lists that disagree: ten on the DPA page, four on the trust centre.
Breach notice "Without undue delay" in the DPA. No hour figure published. 48 hours in the DPA and the trust centre. The public compliance page still says 72 hours.
Retention of enriched data Results kept on the account three months, then deleted. Deletion at contract end; event logs one year. Revealed records stay usable for the contract; enrichment inputs kept only for the process. Delete or return within 30 days of termination.
SSO Google SSO on all plans. Custom identity provider as an Enterprise add-on. SSO ticked on both published tiers.
Where each tool gets personal data, and how someone removes theirs Holds no contact database for enrichment; queries providers on request. Removal through fullenrich.com/optout, no response SLA published. Builds its own database from its own capture, public sources, manual research and third-party vendors. Removal through a self-serve Privacy Centre, with a customer-visible opt-out list and a Compliance API.
DNC and TPS screening Not documented. FullEnrich keeps no calling list to screen, so screening happens at your dialler. Screens mobiles against national do-not-call registers and lets you remove, flag or leave matches. Cognism’s own pages say 15 or 16 lists and name 12 jurisdictions.
Trustpilot About four in five one-star reviews come from people whose personal number reached a caller. The same pattern in the same proportion. Neither profile measures the product’s data quality, so this page publishes no Trustpilot score.
View FullEnrich security documentation

Public testimonials, quoted as published.

What they say about us

“When you're scaling a 1,000-person sales org across 80 countries, bad data kills your pipeline. We piloted FullEnrich with over 70 reps. The results? 2.4x more mobiles found, connect rates that jumped from 6% to 30%, and 5x fewer invalid numbers. They're not just another data vendor. They're the foundation our global outreach runs on.”

Olivier Elbaz

Global Head of Expansion

Deel

2.4×

more mobile numbers found

6% → 30%

connect rates on the pilot

5×

fewer invalid numbers

Watch

“Your real differentiator is the accuracy of the data. You've developed a technique where you know what's accurate and what's not, which is not the same as other players. When you're scaling as we are, even a 5 to 10% accuracy increase has a huge impact on the entire yield.”

W

Wilfried Juncker

Managing Director Americas

Odoo

“FullEnrich outclasses every other solution. 100k+ outbound emails/month — waterfall enrichment doubled our rate. Doing outbound without it is absurd.”

100k+ outbound emails / month
V

Victor Alexandrian

COO at Scalability

“3× more phone numbers on the same list. FullEnrich is at the heart of my entire outbound agency.”

3× more mobile numbers
K

Kevin Gohin

CEO at Hook Agency

“The data is great, they innovate and ship fast, and the team is made of talented, helpful and extremely nice humans you'd love to work with.”

+18% connection rates
G

Grasia Maria Madsen

VP of RevOps at PriceShape

“FullEnrich has enabled my sales team to be operational nearly 100% of the time, all with qualified leads. With more than 200 cold calls a day, life without FullEnrich would be unthinkable.”

200+ cold calls / day
P

Paul Lagrange

CEO & Co-founder at Omogen

“Hey Benjamin. Happy users of FullEnrich - we benchmarked quite a few providers, you were the best. Kudos!”

A

Aditya Lahiri

At SaasStr! Co-founder at OpenFunnel

“Hi Benjamin! Olivier reached out to me a few weeks ago to try your tool and it has been the best tool my team and I have used so far! (in my career also)”

M

Marlou Hofman

Head of Sales Development EMEA at Incode | Tech Enthusiast | IDV & KYC

Loved by thousands of GTM teams.

Explore the Wall of Love
Run the test

How do you run a fair test of Cognism against FullEnrich?

Don’t compare claims. Run the same contacts through both. FullEnrich gives you 50 free credits with no card, so you can test it before you buy.

  1. Step 1

    Pick 100 to 250 real contacts

    Use the territory and persona you actually care about. Give both tools the exact same list.

  2. Step 2

    Run the same list through both

    Use Cognism through its sample or sales-led trial. Run the same contacts through FullEnrich with free credits first, then a paid plan if you need more volume.

  3. Step 3

    Count what your team can actually use

    Don’t score rows returned. Score valid emails, real mobiles and whether the contact is actually reachable.

  4. Step 4

    Price the result

    Compare the cost of the usable records each tool produced. Take that number into the renewal conversation.

Start the test free 4.8 on G2, 231 reviews G2

50 free credits, no card, unlimited users.

FullEnrich vs Cognism FAQs

Short answers to the Cognism questions that do not need a full section.

More comparisons

Compare FullEnrich with other data providers

Each page puts FullEnrich next to one provider, with dated first-party sources and the rows where the competitor wins.

FullEnrich vs ZoomInfo

The waterfall next to an all-in-one sales intelligence platform.

Read the comparison

Don’t compare claims. Run the same list through both.

  • 50 free credits
  • No credit card required
  • GDPR & CCPA compliant
Test FullEnrich free Talk to Sales