Hunter.io used to be a great tool for years because of its simplicity. But behind the scenes: credits blow up budget fast, there are no mobile numbers, and match rates are nosediving outside the US.

That’s when I started prioritizing outreach effectiveness and helped create FullEnrich. It pulls from 20+ live data sources, using waterfall enrichment.

Hunter’s narrow focus on public emails means missing 60% of reachable contacts, and offers zero mobile or direct dials. This forces you to buy extra tools for phone numbers and intent data.

That drives up CRM enrichment costs anywhere from 40 to 80%. Outside the US/UK, match rates dip to 10–20%.

So let's dive into the best hunter io alternatives available right now 👇

1. FullEnrich

Hunter.io gives you one data source. FullEnrich gives you twenty. That explains why teams switching from Hunter see their match rates jump from 30% to 80%.

Instead of hoping Hunter’s scraping finds your prospect, I helped create FullEnrich. Its waterfall enrichment runs through multiple providers until it finds valid contact data. Need personal and professional emails? Done. The user-friendly interface helped manage leads and lead generation through its advanced filters.

When Apollo doesn't have a number, it checks ZoomInfo's extensive database. When ZoomInfo comes up empty, it queries Cognism. This continues across all 15 sources. Instead of wasting unlimited email credits, FullEnrich provides you with the same benefits in one comprehensive platform.

Who FullEnrich is Best For

Teams prioritize maximum contact coverage over having another "all-in-one" platform. If you already have a CRM and lead generation tools you like, FullEnrich slots in perfectly as your data engine.

Key Features

• Vast database. Instant access to 20+ data sources, including Apollo, ZoomInfo, Lusha, and Cognism in one platform

• Triple email verification that only charges for deliverable personal and business emails.

• Accurate email addresses to reach the key decision makers with confidence.

• Phone number enrichment with mobile and direct dial coverage Hunter lacks entirely.

• Geographic optimization that automatically selects the best provider for each region.

• API-first architecture with native CRM integrations.

• Pay-per-valid-contact model, no charges for bounces or invalid company data.

• Advanced search filters so you hit the spot, every time.

• Email verifier feature

• Offers buyer intent signals for maximum ROI.

Ease of Use

RevOps teams love the straightforward API, up-to-date databas,e and bulk enrichment options. SDRs can enrich directly from LinkedIn with the Chrome extension. The best part is that there's no learning curve. Just upload a CSV and get enriched and accurate data back in minutes.

Pricing

Paid packages start at $29/month for 250 credits with genuine monthly billing (not Hunter's "monthly" that's really annual). Credits work for both email finder and phone enrichment options.

• Starter Plan: $29/month for 250 credits.

• Growth: $55/month for 500 credits.

• Scale: $299/month for 3,000 credits.

• Enterprise: Custom pricing with volume discounts.

👉 Check how FullEnrich's pricing compares to Hunter.io

Pros and Cons

Why FullEnrich Over Hunter.io

1. Triple the coverage: 80% match rate versus Hunter's 30% average

2. Phone numbers included: Get mobile and direct dials. Hunter can't provide

3. No wasted credits: Only pay for valid contacts, not searches that return nothing

What Users Are Saying

G2 Rating: 4.8/5

"Switched from Hunter to FullEnrich and our pipeline grew 37%. The waterfall approach finds contacts Hunter completely misses." - Geoffrey, CEO at Guideflo.w

"Data is good but lacking in UX" - Verified User in Telecommunications

Bottom Line

Does data quality and coverage matter more than having another inbox tool? Then FullEnrich delivers what Hunter.io fundamentally cannot.

👉 Start your free trial and get 50 credits

2. Apollo.io: The All-in-One Sales Platform Alternative to Hunter.io

I’ve used Hunter.io plenty over the years. It’s a straightforward email finder, and does the job fast.

Apollo.io feels like running my whole sales shop in one place. We’re talking 275 million contacts, built-in sequencing, and full CRM baked right in. For me, that killed the hassle of juggling multiple tools, including Hunter.

The trade-off is that Apollo pulls data from one main source. So, while the feature list is massive, match rates can dip below Hunter’s in some segments. Still, for my team, having everything under one roof was worth it.

Who Apollo.io is Best For

Growing sales teams that want prospecting, outreach, and CRM functionality. All in one platform, minus the enterprise pricing.

Key Features

• 275M+ B2B contact database with emails and contact numbers.

• Built-in sales engagement with multi-channel sequences.

• Real-time intent data and buying signals Hunter doesn't offer. 

• Native CRM or integrations with Salesforce/HubSpot. 

• Call recording and AI coaching features.

• Team collaboration tools for pipeline management. 

• Offers in-depth prospect data, including personal and professional emails.

Ease of Use

More complex than Hunter due to the feature set. Expect a 2-week ramp-up period for full adoption. The UI is modern but can overwhelm new users initially.

Pricing

Starting at $49/user/month with a credit-based system.

• Free Plan: Limited to 60 credits/month.

• Basic: $49/user/month with 500 credits.

• Professional: $99/user/month with 1,000 credits.

• Organization: $5,000/year minimum with custom credits

Note: Mobile numbers cost 8 credits each, which adds up quickly.

Pros and Cons

Why Apollo.io Over Hunter.io

1. Contact numbers included: Get mobile and direct dials alongside emails

2. Sales automation built-in: Run campaigns without needing Lemlist or Outreach

3. Buyer Intent data: Know who's actually in-market, not just their email address

What Users Are Saying

G2 Rating: 4.8/5

"Apollo replaced Hunter, Outreach, and partially our CRM. The database isn't perfect,t but having everything integrated saves hours daily." - Verified User, Mid-Market

"There's only two issues with Apollo: Phone numbers mentioned on Apollo are usually outdated and compared to other outbound tools, it's an expensive tool." - Anam A

Bottom Line

Choose Apollo if you want an all-in-one platform and can manage the credit system. Skip it if you just need an email finder.

3. ZoomInfo: The Enterprise-Grade Hunter.io Alternative

I’ve tried Hunter.io and ZoomInfo both, and ZoomInfo just feels like more premium. It costs about 30x more, but you’re getting enterprise-grade data, not scraps.

Here's the verdict from the trenches of my own campaigns:

ZoomInfo nailed quality, compliance, and features that Hunter.io can’t touch. Hunter only scrapes public info off websites. ZoomInfo's got thousands of actual humans updating and verifying the database nonstop.

You pay more, but you’re not wasting time on outdated contacts. I’d rather spend on verified data than burn credits chasing ghosts.

Who ZoomInfo is Best For

Enterprise sales teams with complex compliance requirements and budgets over $15,000/year for data.

Key Features

• Human-verified contact data with 95% accuracy guarantees.

 • Advanced intent data from 25,000+ sources. 

• Org charts and reporting structures for account mapping. 

• Technographics showing full tech stacks. 

• Conversation intelligence and call recording.

• FormComplete for instant lead capture enrichment.

Ease of Use

Powerful but complex. Most teams need dedicated RevOps support for full utilization. The learning curve is significant; budget 30 days for team adoption.

Pricing

Custom pricing starting around $15,000/year for small teams:

• Professional: ~$15,000/year (5 seats minimum)

• Advanced: ~$25,000/year with buyer intent data

• Elite: ~$40,000+/year with all features

Actual pricing depends on database access level and features selected.

Pros and Cons

Why ZoomInfo Over Hunter.io

1. Data quality: Human-verified contacts versus web scraping

2. Company intelligence: Complete account insights beyond contact info

3. Compliance: Enterprise-grade GDPR and CCPA compliance tools

What Users Are Saying

G2 Rating: 4.4/5

"Night and day difference from Hunter. Yes, it's expensive, but our connect rates doubled and we have full account intelligence." - VP Sales, Enterprise SaaS.

"Zoominfo is really good at getting outdated or useless information like someones youtube page" - Liam C.

Bottom Line

ZoomInfo is worth it if you have enterprise requirements and a budget. Otherwise, it's massive overkill for basic email finding.

4. Cognism: The GDPR-Compliant European Alternative to Hunter.io

I’ve seen Hunter struggle with international data time and again. But when I run campaigns in Europe, Cognism performs better. Its GDPR-compliant B2B contact data has saved me from bounce nightmares. If your prospects are in the EU, Cognism delivers where Hunter fails.

Cognism’s Diamond Data® includes verified mobile numbers for European prospects. Their compliance-first approach lets you call prospects legally in Germany or France. Hunter doesn’t even attempt this.

Who Cognism is Best For

B2B teams targeting European markets. Teams needing strict GDPR compliance with verified mobile numbers.

Key Features

• Diamond Data® with verified mobile numbers. 

• GDPR-compliant data collection and processing.

• 98% mobile number accuracy in covered regions. 

• Intent data from Bombora integration.

• Chrome extension for LinkedIn enrichment. 

• Unrestricted access to contact views (no credit limits).

Ease of Use

Intuitive platform with excellent European language support. SDRs can be productive within days, not weeks.

Pricing

Custom pricing with minimum commitments around $12,000/year:

• Minimum 3 seats required

• Pricing based on target markets and data needs

• Typically $12,000-$30,000/year for small teams

Pros and Cons

Why Cognism Over Hunter.io

1. European coverage: 70% match rate in the EU versus Hunter's 20%

2. Mobile numbers: Verified Diamond Data® for direct dials

3. Compliance: Built-in GDPR compliance tools and audit trails

What Users Are Saying

G2 Rating: 4.6/5

"For European prospects, Cognism is untouchable. We switched from Hunter, and our connect rates in Germany went from 15% to 65%." - Head of Sales, UK Saa.S

"Too pricey for me" - Verified User in Computer & Network Security

Bottom Line

Essential for European markets, unnecessary for US-only teams. The premium pricing is justified by superior international data quality.

5. Lusha: The Individual Contributor's Hunter.io Alternative

Lusha targets individual SDRs and recruiters who need quick contact lookups. For me, it's simpler than Hunter but includes the contact numbers Hunter lacks.

Lusha has an extension-first approach. That means you're finding contacts while browsing LinkedIn, not uploading CSV files. For SDRs who live in Sales Navigator, Lusha feels more natural than Hunter's domain-based searching.

Who Lusha is Best For

Individual SDRs and recruiters. Anyone who needs simple, accurate contact data directly from LinkedIn profiles.

Key Features

• LinkedIn integration via Chrome extension. 

• Direct phone numbers alongside emails. 

• CRM auto-sync with Salesforce and HubSpot. 

• Prospecting lists with 25+ advanced search filters. 

• Real-time verification before export. 

• Bulk lookups for list building.

Ease of Use

Dead simple. Install the browser extension, browse LinkedIn, and click to reveal contacts. No training required, SDRs are productive immediately.

Pricing

Credit-based pricing starting at $29/user/month:

• Free: 5 credits/month

• Pro: $29/month for 480 credits/year

• Premium: $51/month for 960 credits/year

• Scale: Custom pricing for teams

Pros and Cons

Why Lusha Over Hunter.io

1. LinkedIn-native: Find contacts while browsing, not through separate searches

2. Contact numbers: Get mobile and direct dials. Hunter doesn't have

3. Simplicity: No learning curve for individual contributors

What Users Are Saying

4.0/5 on Capterra

"Way easier than Hunter for LinkedIn prospecting. The contact numbers alone justify the switch." - SDR, Series B Startup.

“I feel like it is quite expensive based on only getting 40 credits per month, per user on the professional package.“ - Nicole T.

Bottom Line

Perfect for individual contributors on LinkedIn. Not suitable for bulk enrichment or team-wide deployments.

6. Seamless.AI: The Real-Time Verification Alternative to Hunter.io

Seamless.AI promises unlimited searches with real-time verification, addressing Hunter's credit limitation complaints. I like how this AI-powered engine continuously updates contact data. Theoretically, it provides fresher information than Hunter's static database.

More practically though, "unlimited" comes with quality trade-offs. You'll get more searches than Hunter, but accuracy varies significantly by industry and geography.

Who Seamless.AI is Best For

High-volume sales teams. Businesses that prioritize quantity over perfect data quality need real-time verification.

Key Features

• "Unlimited" searches (with fair use policies). 

• Real-time verification engine. 

• AI-powered research for contact updates. 

• Chrome extension for web browsing. 

• Intent data and buyer signals. 

• CRM integrations with major platforms.

Ease of Use

Simple interface, but the "unlimited" model encourages spray-and-pray tactics. Teams need discipline to maintain quality prospecting.

Pricing

Subscription-based starting at $147/month:

• Basic: $147/month per user.

• Pro: Custom pricing with advanced features.

• Enterprise: Custom pricing with dedicated support.

Pros and Cons

Why Seamless.AI Over Hunter.io

1. No credit anxiety: Search without counting every lookup

2. Real-time data: Fresher information than static databases

3. Intent signals: Know who's actively buying

What Users Are Saying

Rated 4.2/5 on Capterra

"More searches than Hunter, but quality is hit-or-miss. Works great for spray-and-pray, not for targeted outreach." - Sales Manager, SMB.

"Absolutely horrible, their customer service is absolutely garbage and they don't help at all." - Mike G.

Bottom Line

Good for volume-based outreach where some bad data is acceptable. Not ideal for targeted, high-value prospecting.

7. RocketReach: The Recruiter-Focused Hunter.io Alternative

RocketReach started as a recruiting tool, and it shows. Hunter focuses on company domains. RocketReach is better at searching social profiles and publications to uncover hidden contacts.

It offers a database of 700 million profiles. It's good for finding people who don’t have obvious company emails.

Who RocketReach is Best For

Recruiters and HR teams looking for passive candidates. Any sales teams targeting specific individuals rather than companies.

Key Features

• 700M professional profiles indexed. 

• Social profile aggregation beyond LinkedIn.

• Mobile and direct contact numbers. 

• Bulk lookup tools for list building. 

• Email patterns for companies. 

• Chrome extension for quick lookups.

Ease of Use

Straightforward for individual lookups but bulk features feel dated. The UI hasn't evolved much since 2018.

Pricing

Credit-based with monthly subscriptions:

• Essential: $48/month for 170 lookups

• Pro: $108/month for 370 lookups

• Ultimate: $207/month for 1,000 lookups

Pros and Cons

Why RocketReach Over Hunter.io

1. Individual focus: Better for person-specific searches versus domain searches

2. Recruiting features: Built for talent acquisition use cases

3. Social coverage: Finds people beyond company websites

What Users Are Saying

G2 Rating: 4.5/5

"The Filters, it is Very Helpful in the Sense of finding your Perfect B2B Clients, it is Very Easy to Use, and The Integrations are also Powerful" - Mohammed B.

"Superior to Hunter for finding specific people, especially in tech. Not great for bulk company enrichment though." - Technical Recruiter

Bottom Line

Choose RocketReach for recruiting or individual-focused sales. Stick with Hunter.io alternatives for bulk B2B enrichment.

8. Clearbit: The Marketing Automation Alternative to Hunter.io

In my experience, Clearbit isn't really an email finder tool. I use it as a data enrichment platform for marketing automation. While Hunter helps you find emails, Clearbit enriches the leads you already have with 100+ data points.

Who Clearbit is Best For

Marketing operations teams running complex automation workflows requiring real-time enrichment and lead routing.

Key Features

• 100+ enrichment attributes per contact/company.

• Real-time form enrichment (Clearbit Forms) .

• Advertising audiences (Facebook, Google).

• Intent data via Bombora partnership.

• Reveal for website visitor identification.

• HubSpot native integration.

Ease of Use

Complex setup requiring technical expertise. Marketing ops teams love it; SDRs find it overwhelming.

Pricing

Platform-based pricing starting at $999/month:

• Growth: $999/month (minimum)

• Business: Custom pricing ~$2,000/month

• Enterprise: $5,000+/month

Pros and Cons

Why Clearbit Over Hunter.io

1. Enrichment depth: 100+ data points versus just email

2. Marketing focus: Built for automation, not sales prospecting

3. Real-time APIs: Instant enrichment for form fills and events

What Users Are Saying

G2 Rating: 4.4/5

"Clearbit helps me connect the dots between quantity and quality of website traffic" - Anubhav N.

"Clearbit and Hunter serve different purposes. We use Clearbit for marketing automation enrichment, not email discovery." - VP Marketing Ops

Bottom Line

Wrong comparison to Hunter unless you need marketing enrichment. Excellent for its intended use case, overkill for email finding.

9. Lead411: The Growth-Stage Startup Alternative to Hunter.io

Lead411 combines affordable lead generation with growth signals. It's good for startups that need more than emails but can't afford enterprise tools. The way i see it, each has its own use case and fan base. Hunter just finds contacts, Lead411 shows you which companies are actually growing.

I like how Lead411's growth intent data includes funding alerts, hiring signals, and technology adoptions. These features can help marketing teams time their outreach perfectly.

Who Lead411 is Best For

Growth-stage startups and SMBs that need verified contacts. Businesses looking for growth intelligence at reasonable prices.

Key Features

• Growth intent triggers (funding, hiring, tech adoption).

• Verified emails and direct dials.

• Technology tracking (technographics).

• Unlimited views on most plans.

• Chrome extension for research.

• CRM exports without credit usage.

Ease of Use

Simple, straightforward interface. Less polished than Hunter but more functional for B2B sales.

Pricing

Flat-rate pricing with unlimited views:

• Basic: $99/month for unlimited views

• Pro: $199/month with direct dials

• Enterprise: Custom pricing

Pros and Cons

Why Lead411 Over Hunter.io

1. Growth signals: Know when companies are ready to buy

2. Unlimited model: No credit anxiety or overages

3. Direct dials: Contact numbers Hunter doesn't provide

What Users Are Saying

4.4/7 on Capterra

"Better value than Hunter for startups. Growth signals alone make it worth switching." - Founder, Series A SaaS

"Useful database but needs to update contacts' email addresses more frequently" - Verified Reviewer.

Bottom Line

Excellent value for growth-stage companies. Limited features but includes what matters most at a fair price.

10. UpLead: The Accuracy-Guaranteed Alternative to Hunter.io

UpLead differentiates with a 95% data accuracy guarantee. My favorite feature is that they credit you for any bounce. While Hunter verifies emails, UpLead goes further with real-time verification and refund policies.

This platform focuses on data quality over quantity. It boasts a smaller but cleaner database than some competitors.

Who UpLead is Best For

Sales teams that prioritize data quality over volume and want bounce protection for their campaigns.

Key Features

• 95% accuracy guarantee with bounce credits.

• Real-time email verification.

• 50+ search filters for targeting.

• Technology tracking and intent data.

• Direct dials included.

• CRM integrations with all major platforms.

Ease of Use

Clean, intuitive interface similar to Hunter but with more search filters. Minimal learning curve.

Pricing

Credit-based with monthly plans.

• Essentials: $99/month for 170 credits

• Plus: $199/month for 400 credits

• Professional: $399/month for 1,000 credits

Pros and Cons

Why UpLead Over Hunter.io

1. Accuracy guarantee: Get credits back for bounces

2. Better filters: 50+ search criteria versus Hunter's basic options

3. Intent data: Built-in buyer signals Hunter lacks

What Users Are Saying

G2 Rating: 4.7/5

"The accuracy guarantee sold us. Switched from Hunter and our bounce rate dropped 70%." - Head of SDR, Mid-Market

"My sales people are saying most leads don't have valid numbers so they're spending most of their time filtering thru leads rather than making calls." - Verified User in Printing.

Bottom Line

Pay more per contact but get better data quality. Worth it if bounce rates are killing your sender reputation.

11. Snovio: The Cold Campaign Alternative to Hunter.io

For me, this is a Frankenstein tool that delivers. Snovio (formerly Snov.io) combines Hunter's email finding with built-in cold email automation. Instead of exporting to another tool, you can run entire campaigns within Snovio.

I think this platform's strength is integration. It finds, verifies, and emails prospects without switching tools or managing multiple subscriptions.

Who Snovio is Best For

Small teams running cold email campaigns who want an all-in-one solution.

Key Features

• Email finder and verifier like Hunter.

• Cold email automation with drip campaigns.

• Email warm-up tool for deliverability.

• Domain search and bulk collection.

• Technology checker for prospects.

• CRM and webhook integrations.

Ease of Use

More complex than Hunter due to campaign features but simpler than full sales engagement platforms.

Pricing

Credit-based with campaign features:

• Trial: $0 with 150 credits.

• Starter: $39/month for 1,000 credits.

• Pro: $99/month for 5,000 credits.

• Custom: Enterprise pricing available.

Pros and Cons

Why Snovio Over Hunter.io

1. Campaign automation: Run cold email without separate tools

2. Email warm-up: Improve deliverability built-in

3. Better pricing: More credits per dollar than Hunter

What Users Are Saying

G2 Rating: 4.5/5

"Replaced Hunter + Lemlist with Snovio. Not as polished but does both jobs adequately for half the cost." - Startup Founder

"As much as I liked their LinkedIn email finder..everything else is a waste" - Divya S.

Bottom Line

Good all-in-one for cold email. Not the best at any one function but convenient for small teams.

12. FindThatLead: The LinkedIn-Focused Hunter.io Alternative

FindThatLead specifically targets LinkedIn prospecting with features Hunter just doesn’t offer.

Uploading LinkedIn profile URLs directly for enrichment is my favorite use case. Hunter can’t do that, and that’s a big deal for me.

Who FindThatLead is Best For

Social sellers and SDRs. Anyone who primarily prospects through LinkedIn and need integrated outreach tools.

Key Features

• LinkedIn profile enrichment via URLs.

• Chrome extension for social prospecting.

• Email campaigns built-in.

• Lead generation from domains.

• Social selling tools.

• Prospector search with filters.

Ease of Use

Simple for LinkedIn users but limited for other use cases. The UI feels dated compared to Hunter.

Pricing

Credit-based monthly plans:

• Starter: $49/month for 5,000 credits.

• Growth: $99/month for 15,000 credits.

• Scale: $299/month for 50,000 credits.

Pros and Cons

Why FindThatLead Over Hunter.io

1. LinkedIn enrichment: Upload profile URLs directly

2. More credits: Better value for high-volume searches

3. Campaign features: Basic automation included

What Users Are Saying

G2 Rating: 4.4/5

"Better than Hunter for LinkedIn but data quality is inconsistent. You get what you pay for." - SDR Manager

"The worst thing is that they don't have a free plan that offers you at least a couple of credits, that is, the trial expires and you can't use anything else." - Miguel José G.

Bottom Line

Decent LinkedIn-focused alternative if you need high volume at low cost. Not suitable for quality-focused teams.

13. ContactOut: The Recruiting-First Hunter.io Alternative

ContactOut is built mainly for recruiters, not general sales teams. It covers about 75% of LinkedIn profiles used for hiring. I've seen recruiters use it to uncover candidates’ personal emails and phone numbers.

It also claims top coverage of Western tech professionals. That makes it especially useful for teams looking for technical talent.

Who ContactOut is Best For

Technical recruiters and talent acquisition teams focusing on engineering and product roles.

Key Features

• 75% LinkedIn coverage for personal emails.

• Personal contact numbers for candidates.

• Chrome extension for one-click enrichment.

• Search portal with 20+ filters.

• ATS integrations for recruiting workflows.

• GDPR/CCPA compliant data.

Ease of Use

Dead simple for recruiters. Install extension, browse LinkedIn, get contact info. No training needed.

Pricing

Credit-based recruiting plans:

• Free: 30 credits/month.

• Personal: $29/month for 300 credits.

• Sales: $99/month for 1,200 credits.

• Recruiting: $199/month for 2,400 credits.

Pros and Cons

Why ContactOut Ranks High Among Hunter.io Alternatives

1. Personal emails: Finds Gmail/personal addresses Hunter won't

2. Recruiting focus: Built specifically for talent acquisition

3. LinkedIn coverage: 75% match rate on profiles

What Users Are Saying

G2 Rating: 4.5/5

"Essential for tech recruiting. Finds engineers Hunter could never locate." - Senior Technical Recruiter

"It's has very less free points and it's expensive and sometimes some numbers are also wrong" - Deepanshu(Dave Simmons)

Bottom Line

Good for recruiting, useless for B2B sales. The anti-Hunter for talent acquisition teams.

14. Dropcontact: The 100% GDPR-Compliant Hunter.io Alternative

This French solution takes a unique approach: they don't store any database. Instead, they generate and verify emails in real-time using proprietary algorithms, making them 100% GDPR compliant.

My European colleagues rave about this one for one simple reason. It excels in European markets where compliance isn't optional and data privacy is paramount.

Who Dropcontact is Best For

European companies or those targeting EU markets with strict compliance requirements.

Key Features

• No database storage (100% GDPR compliant).

• Real-time email generation and verification.

• Duplicate detection and merging.

• CRM cleaning and enrichment.

• LinkedIn integration via extension.

• API for automation.

Ease of Use

Simple interface but different paradigm from Hunter. You're generating emails, not searching a database.

Pricing

Credit-based with monthly plans:

• Starter: €24/month for 1,000 credits

• Growth: €55/month for 3,000 credits

• Business: €139/month for 10,000 credits

Pros and Cons

Why Dropcontact Is One Of The Best Hunter.io Alternatives

1. True GDPR compliance: No database means no data privacy issues

2. CRM cleaning: Deduplication and enrichment features

3. European focus: Better for EU markets

What Users Are Saying

G2 Rating: 4.7/5

"Perfect for GDPR compliance. Match rate lower than Hunter but legally bulletproof." - Sales Director, French SaaS

"A fair amount of individuals (~50%) end up without email addresses." - Max F.

Bottom Line

Choose compliance over coverage. Ideal for risk-averse European companies.

15. Kaspr: The Sales Navigator Hunter Alternative

Kaspr offers instant enrichment without leaving the platform. Hunter makes me run domain searches. Kaspr works much faster, right from LinkedIn profiles.

I love that it focuses on European data compliance yet keeps solid global coverage.

Who Kaspr is Best For

Sales teams with Sales Navigator licenses. Businesses who want seamless LinkedIn enrichment with phone numbers.

Key Features

• Sales Navigator integration with bulk enrichment.

• Phone numbers (mobile and direct).

• GDPR compliant data collection.

• Extension for LinkedIn.

• Workflow automation with webhooks.

• Team collaboration features.

Ease of Use

Seamless for Sales Navigator users. The workflow stays entirely within LinkedIn, eliminating context switching.

Pricing

Credit-based with user licenses:

• Starter: €49/user/month

• Business: €79/user/month

• Enterprise: Custom pricing

Pros and Cons

Why Kaspr Over Hunter.io

1. Sales Navigator native: No switching between tools

2. Contact numbers included: Direct dials Hunter lacks

3. Workflow efficiency: Enrich while prospecting

What Users Are Saying

G2 Rating: 4.4/5

"If you live in Sales Navigator, Kaspr is a no-brainer over Hunter." - Enterprise AE

"I subscribed and tried to cancel the subscription but there were no the way to unsubscribe. I asked the support but they started to say about this is against their policy." - Anatolii U.

Bottom Line

Useful for Sales Navigator power users. Unnecessary if you don't have LinkedIn licenses.

Why FullEnrich is the Best Hunter.io Alternative

After analyzing all these hunter.io alternatives, FullEnrich stands out for five critical reasons:

1. Unmatched Coverage Through Waterfall Enrichment

While Hunter and others rely on single data sources, FullEnrich aggregates 15+ premium providers. When one lead generation source fails, another succeeds. This isn't just incrementally better, it's transformative for pipeline generation.

2. Quality Without Compromise

Triple email verification ensures you only pay for deliverable contacts. No more budget surprises from bad data or verification credits. Every email is checked against multiple validators before you're charged. It's a solid email finder tool for a reason!

3. True Flexibility

Hunter's lead generation ties you into hidden annual contracts. Apollo’s credits expire before you can use them. The solution? FullEnrich. It gives simple month-to-month billing with rolling credits. Scale up or down based on actual needs, not locked-in commitments.

4. Phone Numbers and Email Finder Tool Included

Stop buying separate tools for phone data. FullEnrich enriches both emails and phone numbers from the same credit pool. That's how you eliminate the need for multiple subscriptions.

5. Transparent, Predictable Pricing for Accurate Data

No seat licenses. No platform fees. No minimum commits. Just pay for the contacts you enrich. Starting at $29/month, you can test the platform risk-free and scale as you grow.

Ready to see the difference? Start with 50 free credits and experience 80% match rates yourself.

FAQs

Which Hunter.io alternative has the best data accuracy?

FullEnrich delivers the highest accuracy through triple email verification across 15+ sources. You only pay for validated, deliverable emails. For single-source providers, ZoomInfo offers human-verified data with 95% accuracy guarantees, though at enterprise pricing.

Can I find contact numbers with Hunter.io alternatives?

Yes, most hunter.io alternatives include contact numbers, something Hunter.io doesn't offer. FullEnrich, Apollo.io, ZoomInfo, Cognism, and Lusha all provide mobile and direct dial numbers. FullEnrich stands out by including both emails and phone numbers in the same credit pool.

What's the most affordable Hunter.io alternative?

For pure affordability, Snovio starts at $39/month with 1,000 credits. However, FullEnrich at $29/month for 250 credits delivers better value. That means you'll find more contacts despite fewer credits through higher match rates.

Which alternative is best for GDPR compliance?

Dropcontact offers 100% GDPR compliance by not storing any database. They generate emails in real-time. Cognism also excels with GDPR-compliant Diamond Data®. FullEnrich maintains compliance through its enterprise providers while delivering better coverage.

Do Hunter.io alternatives offer free trials?

Most offer free trials or credits. FullEnrich provides 50 free credits without requiring a credit card. Apollo.io has a free plan with 60 monthly credits. Lusha offers 5 free credits monthly. These trials let you test data quality before committing.

Which tool is best for LinkedIn prospecting?

Kaspr and ContactOut excel at LinkedIn enrichment with native Sales Navigator integration. FullEnrich's Chrome extension does that while providing superior match rates through waterfall enrichment.

Can I integrate these alternatives with my CRM?

Yes, all major hunter.io alternatives offer CRM integrations. Apollo.io and ZoomInfo provide the deepest integrations with Salesforce and HubSpot. FullEnrich offers API-first architecture. It works with any CRM plus native integrations with major platforms.

What's the best alternative for international data?

FullEnrich automatically selects the best provider for each geography from its 15+ sources. Cognism specializes in European data with verified mobile numbers. ZoomInfo offers strong global coverage at enterprise prices.

Which alternative includes email automation?

Apollo.io and Snovio include built-in email sequencing and automation. FullEnrich integrates with best-in-class automation tools like Outreach and Salesloft. That gives you more flexibility in your tech stack.

Do credits expire with Hunter.io alternatives?

Unfortunately, most alternatives follow Hunter's model of expiring credits. Apollo.io and Lusha credits expire monthly without rollover. FullEnrich credits roll over for 3-12 months depending on your plan. That's a significant advantage for variable usage patterns.

Final Recommendation

From running outreach for years, I’ve tried every Hunter.io alternative out there. The best Hunter.io alternative depends on what your priorities are. We’ve seen tools crush it on pricing but flop on data. Others nail accuracy but feel clunky day to day. That’s why I always weigh our needs before picking a new platform:

For Maximum Coverage (Any Size): FullEnrich delivers 80% match rates through waterfall enrichment. Start at $29/month and scale as needed.

For All-in-One Simplicity (Growth Stage): Apollo.io at $49/user/month provides a complete sales platform if you can manage the credit system.

For Enterprise Requirements (Large Teams): ZoomInfo justifies its $15,000+ price tag with human-verified data and compliance tools.

For European Markets (GDPR Critical): Cognism's Diamond Data® or Dropcontact's real-time generation ensure compliance without sacrificing coverage.

Most teams, including mine, find FullEnrich's waterfall approach delivers the best ROI. You get more contacts found, higher data quality, and predictable costs.

Ready to Triple Your Contact Data Coverage?

Stop settling for Hunter.io's 30% match rates. For my team, FullEnrich's waterfall enrichment found contacts other tools consistently missed. That includes the phone numbers and sales tools Hunter lacks.

All while only charging for valid data and more targeted leads you'll actually use.

Try FullEnrich with 50 free credits→ No credit card required. Make your free account and see your actual match rate improvement in minutes, even on the free version.